<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <title>Matthew&apos;s Philosophy Blog</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/" />
    <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/atom.xml" />
    <id>tag:matthew.ektopos.com,2009-05-13:/philosophy//15</id>
    <updated>2009-02-13T01:44:57Z</updated>
    
    <generator uri="http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/">Movable Type Pro 4.25</generator>

<entry>
    <title>Converstations with Izzy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/2009/02/converstations-with-izzy-2.html" />
    <id>tag:matthew.ektopos.com,2009:/philosophy//15.5559</id>

    <published>2009-02-13T01:32:24Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-13T01:44:57Z</updated>

    <summary>While driving Izzy and friend to see Disney on Ice I overheard the following conversation from the back-seat. Ellery: What does your daddy do?Izzy: He&apos;s a philosopher. Ellery: (long pause) What do philosophers do? Izzy: They grade papers... oh and think about stuff. Mostly they just grade papers though. I had to laugh because there are those days when what Izzy said seems all too true....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Mullins</name>
        <uri>http://matthew.ektopos.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/">
        <![CDATA[<p>While driving Izzy and friend to see Disney on Ice I overheard the following conversation from the back-seat.</p>

<blockquote>
Ellery: What does your daddy do?<br /><br /><p>Izzy: He's a philosopher.</p>

<p>Ellery: (long pause) What do philosophers do?</p>

<p>Izzy: They grade papers... oh and think about stuff. Mostly they just grade papers though.</p></blockquote>

<p>I had to laugh because there are those days when what Izzy said seems all too true.</p>

<p><br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Responsible Belief in the Face of Disagreement</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/2009/02/responsible-belief-in-the-face.html" />
    <id>tag:matthew.ektopos.com,2009:/philosophy//15.5542</id>

    <published>2009-02-04T04:45:16Z</published>
    <updated>2009-02-04T04:54:03Z</updated>

    <summary>August 18-20, 2009 VU University Amsterdam the Netherlands Keynote Speakers Robert Audi (University of Notre Dame) Richard Feldman (University of Rochester) Bruce Russell (Wayne State University) Conference Theme The ethics of belief and the phenomenon of disagreement are two epistemological topics that show an interesting revival during the last few decades. This conference aims to draw the two issues together: What is it to acquire or hold responsible belief on some issue if that issue is the subject of (fierce) controversy? How does the existence of (known) disagreement affect the epistemic status of our beliefs? And what sort of cognitive response is appropriate when one is confronted with opposed views on a subject matter considered? Background This is the second Amsterdam-based conference organized by the Knowledge, Belief, and Normativity project run by René van Woudenberg, Duncan Pritchard, and Igor Douven. The first conference in Amsterdam was held in 2007. The project is funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO)....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Mullins</name>
        <uri>http://matthew.ektopos.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Conferences" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/">
        <![CDATA[<p>August 18-20, 2009<br />
<a href="http://www.vu.nl/en/index.asp">VU University Amsterdam</a><br />
the Netherlands</p>

<p><strong>Keynote Speakers</strong><br />
Robert Audi (University of Notre Dame)<br />
Richard Feldman (University of Rochester)<br />
Bruce Russell (Wayne State University)</p>

<p><strong>Conference Theme</strong><br />
The ethics of belief and the phenomenon of disagreement are two epistemological topics that show an interesting revival during the last few decades. This conference aims to draw the two issues together: What is it to acquire or hold responsible belief on some issue if that issue is the subject of (fierce) controversy? How does the existence of (known) disagreement affect the epistemic status of our beliefs? And what sort of cognitive response is appropriate when one is confronted with opposed views on a subject matter considered? </p>

<p><strong>Background</strong><br />
This is the second Amsterdam-based conference organized by the <a href="http://www.knowledgebeliefnormativity.org/index.html">Knowledge, Belief, and Normativity</a> project run by René van Woudenberg, Duncan Pritchard, and Igor Douven. The first conference in Amsterdam was held in 2007. The project is funded by the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>CFP: 2009 ESSLLI Student Session</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/2009/01/cfp-2009-esslli-student-sessio.html" />
    <id>tag:matthew.ektopos.com,2009:/philosophy//15.5486</id>

    <published>2009-01-08T16:31:18Z</published>
    <updated>2009-01-08T16:41:32Z</updated>

    <summary>Deadline Extended: February 14, 2009 Announcement The Student Session of the 21st European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information will take place in Bordeaux, France from July 20 to July 31. We invite submission of papers in the areas of logic and computation, logic and language, and language and computation, for presentation at the Student Session and for appearance in the proceedings. Aim of the Student Session The aim of the Student Session is to give undergraduate, masters, and doctoral students the chance to present their work. In addition, each paper is reviewed by three specialists in the field, which gives authors useful feedback regardless of whether the paper is accepted. Prizes As in previous years, Springer is offering Euro 1000 in prizes. Euro 500 in Springer textbooks will go to first prize, and Euro 250 will go to each of two runners-up....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Mullins</name>
        <uri>http://matthew.ektopos.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/">
        <![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">Deadline Extended: February 14, 2009

<p>Announcement</div></p>

<p>The Student Session of the 21st European Summer School in Logic, Language and Information will take place in Bordeaux, France from July 20 to July 31. We invite submission of papers in the areas of logic and computation, logic and language, and language and computation, for presentation at the Student Session and for appearance in the proceedings.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">Aim of the Student Session</div></p>

<p>The aim of the Student Session is to give undergraduate, masters, and doctoral students the chance to present their work. In addition, each paper is reviewed by three specialists in the field, which gives authors useful feedback regardless of whether the paper is accepted.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">Prizes</div></p>

<p>As in previous years, Springer is offering Euro 1000 in prizes. Euro 500 in Springer textbooks will go to first prize, and Euro 250 will go to each of two runners-up.</p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<div style="text-align: center;">Submission</div>

<p>All submissions must represent original, unpublished work, and all (co-)authors must be students (i.e., before the completion of the Ph.D.).</p>

<p>Papers should be submitted as a pdf file to the EasyChair site:</p>

<p><a href="http://www.easychair.org/conferences/?conf=essllistus09">EasyChair ESSLLI StuS 2009</a></p>

<p>Authors must choose a category for submission: Logic and Computation, Logic and Language, or Language and Computation. It is also requested that authors specify whether they would be interested in presenting in the oral or the poster session. If both boxes are checked, or if neither box is checked, it will be assumed that there is no preference.</p>

<p>Please note that at least one of the authors will have to register as an ESSLLI participant.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">Format</div></p>

<p>All papers must be submitted in pdf format (though each paper accepted will eventually have to be in LaTeX format).</p>

<p>Papers should use single column A4 size pages, in 11pt or 12pt font, with standard margins, and must not exceed 7 pages exclusive of references. (The final version, for publication in the proceedings, can be up to 10 pages.)</p>

<p>All papers should be anonymous, so please eliminate all information that might identify the author. Non-anonymous papers will not be considered.<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">Acceptance</div></p>

<p>Each submission will be reviewed by three experts in the area of the paper, and the final decisions will be made based on these reviews.</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Epistemology at the Central Meeting</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/2009/01/epistemology-at-the-central-me.html" />
    <id>tag:matthew.ektopos.com,2009:/philosophy//15.5476</id>

    <published>2009-01-06T02:52:24Z</published>
    <updated>2009-01-06T04:06:12Z</updated>

    <summary>Thursday II-D Author Meets Critics: Jonathan Sutton, Without Justification 9:00am-Noon Chair: E.J. Coffman (University of Tennessee) Critics: Earl Conee (University of Rochester) Jennifer Lackey (Northwestern University) Matthew McGrath (University of Missouri-Columbia) Author: Jonathan Sutton (Auburn University) Friday II-G Colloquium: Rationality 9:00-10:00am Chair: Baron Reed (Northwestern University) Speaker: Berislav Marusic (Brandeis University) &quot;Epistemic Evasion&quot; Commentator: Brian Boeninger (University of Notre Dame) 10:00-11:00am Chair: Chris Waterhouse (University of St. Andrews) Speaker: Daniel M. Johnson (Baylor University) &quot;Proper Function and Should-Be-Believed Defeaters&quot; Commentator: Warren E. Shrader (Indiana University-South Bend) 11:00am-Noon Chair: Matthew Mullins (Northwestern University) Speaker: Paul Weirich (University of Missouri) &quot;Calibration&quot; Commentator: Arthor Paul Pedersen (Carnegie Mellon University) III-E Colloquium: Knowledge and Value 1:45-2:45pm Chair: Remy Debes (University of Memphis) Speaker: Adam Pelser (Baylor University) &quot;Emotional Knowledge: Emotion as a Basic Source of Justification&quot; Commentator: Jay Wood (Wheaton College) 2:45-3:45pm Chair: Evan Fales (University of Iowa) Speaker: Allan J. Hazlett (Fordham University) &quot;Is Knowledge Something Everyone Wants?&quot; Commentator: Daniel Howard-Snyder (Western Washington University) 3:45-4:45pm Chair: Mylan Engel, Jr. (Northern Illinois University) Speaker: Sarah Wright (University of Georgia) &quot;Virtue Epistemology and Contextualism&quot; Commentator: Noah Lemos (College of William and Mary) III-I Colloquium: Foundations of Knowledge 1:45-2:45pm Chair: Jeffrey E. Brower (Purdue University) Speaker:...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Mullins</name>
        <uri>http://matthew.ektopos.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/">
        <![CDATA[<p><strong>Thursday</strong></p>

<p>II-D Author Meets Critics: Jonathan Sutton, <em>Without Justification</em><br />
9:00am-Noon<br />
Chair: E.J. Coffman (University of Tennessee)<br />
Critics: Earl Conee (University of Rochester)<br />
Jennifer Lackey (Northwestern University)<br />
Matthew McGrath (University of Missouri-Columbia)<br />
Author: Jonathan Sutton (Auburn University)</p>

<p><strong>Friday</strong></p>

<p>II-G Colloquium: Rationality<br />
9:00-10:00am<br />
Chair: Baron Reed (Northwestern University)<br />
Speaker: Berislav Marusic (Brandeis University)<br />
"Epistemic Evasion"<br />
Commentator: Brian Boeninger (University of Notre Dame)</p>

<p>10:00-11:00am<br />
Chair: Chris Waterhouse (University of St. Andrews)<br />
Speaker: Daniel M. Johnson (Baylor University)<br />
"Proper Function and Should-Be-Believed Defeaters"<br />
Commentator: Warren E. Shrader (Indiana University-South Bend)</p>

<p>11:00am-Noon<br />
Chair: Matthew Mullins (Northwestern University)<br />
Speaker: Paul Weirich (University of Missouri)<br />
"Calibration"<br />
Commentator: Arthor Paul Pedersen (Carnegie Mellon University)</p>

<p>III-E Colloquium: Knowledge and Value<br />
1:45-2:45pm<br />
Chair: Remy Debes (University of Memphis)<br />
Speaker: Adam Pelser (Baylor University)<br />
"Emotional Knowledge: Emotion as a Basic Source of Justification"<br />
Commentator: Jay Wood (Wheaton College)</p>

<p>2:45-3:45pm<br />
Chair: Evan Fales (University of Iowa)<br />
Speaker: Allan J. Hazlett (Fordham University)<br />
"Is Knowledge Something Everyone Wants?"<br />
Commentator: Daniel Howard-Snyder (Western Washington University)</p>

<p>3:45-4:45pm<br />
Chair: Mylan Engel, Jr. (Northern Illinois University)<br />
Speaker: Sarah Wright (University of Georgia)<br />
"Virtue Epistemology and Contextualism"<br />
Commentator: Noah Lemos (College of William and Mary)</p>

<p>III-I Colloquium: Foundations of Knowledge<br />
1:45-2:45pm<br />
Chair: Jeffrey E. Brower (Purdue University)<br />
Speaker: Todd Long (California Polytechnic State University)<br />
"A Bone for Traditional Foundationalism"<br />
Commentator: Mark Heller (Sryacuse University)</p>

<p>2:45-3:45pm<br />
Chair: Giovanni Mion (Southern Methodist University)<br />
Speaker: Julianne Chung (University of Calgary)<br />
"The Assumptions Account of Knowledge Attributions"<br />
Commentator: Kelly M. Becker (University of New Mexico)</p>

<p>3:45pm-4:45pm<br />
Chair: Aloysius P. Martinich (University of Texas-Austin)<br />
Speaker: Robert Bass (Coastal Carolina University)<br />
"Knowledge Without Truth?"<br />
Commentator: Gerald Vision (Temple University)</p>

<p><strong>Saturday</strong></p>

<p>IV-C Author Meets Critics: Michael Bergmann, <em>Justification without Awareness</em><br />
9:00am-Noon<br />
Chair: Matthia Steup (Purdue University)<br />
Critics: Richard Fumerton (University of Iowa)<br />
John Greco (Saint Louis University)<br />
Joel Prust (University of Delaware)<br />
Authors: Michael Bergmann (Purdue University)</p>

<p>V-G Colloquium: Reliabilism<br />
2:30-3:30PM<br />
Chair: Alexander Arnold (University of Notre Dame)<br />
Speaker: Victor Kumar (University of Arizona)<br />
"Kinds of Reliability"<br />
Commentator: Nathan Ballantyne (University of Arizona)</p>

<p>3:30-4:30pm<br />
Chair: Andrew Bailey (University of Notre Dame)<br />
Speaker: Chris Tucker (Stonehill College)<br />
"Greco's Reliability Requirement"<br />
Commentator: Thomas D. Senor (University of Arkansas)</p>

<p>4:30-5:30pm<br />
Chair: Ryan Doran (Northwestern University)<br />
Speaker: Mark E. Wunderlich (Union College)<br />
"Avoiding the Generality Problem for Process Reliabilism"<br />
Commentator: John Shoemaker (University of Rochester)</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Converstations with Izzy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/2008/11/converstations-with-izzy-1.html" />
    <id>tag:matthew.ektopos.com,2008:/philosophy//15.5397</id>

    <published>2008-11-25T08:12:33Z</published>
    <updated>2008-11-25T08:14:45Z</updated>

    <summary>I&apos;ve often been disposed to think that most people are natural dualists when it comes to the mind/body question. My daughter, at the tender age of four, is proving to be something of a natural materialist. Her materialism frequently results in humorous remarks. Consider this nugget. Yesterday my daughter was extolling the virtues of several recipes I could prepare for a visit from the grandparents. To close the conversation she chirped &quot;So keep those recipes in your brain Dad!&quot; Of course, the common saying is to &quot;keep in mind&quot; but she&apos;s apparently decided to dispose with such folk concepts as the mind!...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Mullins</name>
        <uri>http://matthew.ektopos.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/">
        <![CDATA[<p>I've often been disposed to think that most people are natural dualists when it comes to the mind/body question. My daughter, at the tender age of four, is proving to be something of a natural materialist. Her materialism frequently results in humorous remarks. Consider this nugget. Yesterday my daughter was extolling the virtues of several recipes I could prepare for a visit from the grandparents. To close the conversation she chirped "So keep those recipes in your brain Dad!" Of course, the common saying is to "keep in mind" but she's apparently decided to dispose with such folk concepts as the mind!</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Application Time</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/2008/11/application-time.html" />
    <id>tag:matthew.ektopos.com,2008:/philosophy//15.5394</id>

    <published>2008-11-23T17:37:22Z</published>
    <updated>2008-11-24T07:45:32Z</updated>

    <summary>It&apos;s the time of year when I start getting emails from prospective grad students asking about Northwestern&apos;s Philosophy department. While I typically don&apos;t mind replying to the emails, it is a busy time of year right now. In an attempt to save my self some time I thought I&apos;d post my replies to some of the typical questions that I get. It should go without saying, but the views expressed below are my own and should in no way be seen as being endorsed or approved by the department or university....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Mullins</name>
        <uri>http://matthew.ektopos.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/">
        <![CDATA[<p>It's the time of year when I start getting emails from prospective grad students asking about Northwestern's Philosophy department. While I typically don't mind replying to the emails, it is a busy time of year right now. In an attempt to save my self some time I thought I'd post my replies to some of the typical questions that I get. It should go without saying, but the views expressed below are my own and should in no way be seen as being endorsed or approved by the department or university. </p>]]>
        <![CDATA[<p>A couple of things of note before I proceed to some direct questions. (1) Applicants should know that the department faculty numbers are not currently at full strength. There are currently <a href=http://www.wcas.northwestern.edu/faculty/FacultyRecruitingandJobOpenings.htm>a number of positions</a> that the department is looking to fill this year; a couple of open rank M&E positions and one German Philosophy with special interests in 19th century. Given the hires the department has made in the last couple of years I would expect these positions to be filled by exceptionally good individuals. (2) Keep in mind that because of the <a href=http://www.cic.net/>CIC</a> program students at NU can take courses at neighbouring institutions such as UIC and the University of Chicago. These ties are strengthened by both the Chicago Area Consortium on German Philosophy and the Chicago Area Consortium on Ancient Greek and Roman Philosophy. </p>

<p><em>Is the focus of the program heavily continental, or pretty evenly balanced between continental and analytic?</em></p>

<p>I know that Northwestern has a reputation as a continental program, but as things currently stand the place isn't particularly continentally oriented. It is probably fair to say the department is skewing analytic these day. Within the department the continental strengths lie in German philosophy from Kant to Heidegger. That said, those of an analytic bent should know that all of the continental people are fairly friendly to, and familiar with, analytic philosophy. So friendly that someone like Cristina Lafont regularly teaches a courses on both Heidegger and co-teaches a course on reference with Gregory Ward in Linguistics. I was never so surprised as when I heard Cristina Lafont say that "The problem with Heidegger is that he lacks a theory of direct reference." </p>

<p><em>Is Northwestern hospitable for analytically inclined grads?</em></p>

<p>In brief, of course! If you are interested in epistemology, philosophy of language, or philosophy of mind, then there is <a href=http://www.wcas.northwestern.edu/epistemology/>a lot that NU has to offer</a> and the future is only getting brighter.  </p>

<p><em>Are the faculty available, friendly, around, etc?</em></p>

<p>I've heard horror stories about unavailable professors who are dismissive of student work and lax in responding to emails, grading, and the like. I'm happy to say that I've never experienced anything like that at NU. I get regular face time with all of the people that I work with, and I always get prompt and helpful comments back on my work. All of the faculty are also required to provide written feedback at the end of every course, and we get feedback from year end departmental evaluations. The faculty also participate in the life of the department by attending talks, participating in reading groups, hosting conferences, throwing parties, and the like. They are all very approachable, engaging, and some are even good for the occasional pub crawl. </p>

<p>You might be thinking, "But of course he'd say that!" However, it's all true and I could have dodged the question entirely.</p>

<p><em>What do you think of your fellow students?</em></p>

<p>They're great folks who I regularly disagree with. One challenge is that because we're a small department you might not have many people who work in the same area as yourself. What this means is that while people are happy to discuss each others work, you might have to do more work explaining problems/concepts up front. Aside from the work we often go out for drinks after talks, and have a few parties every term.</p>

<p><em>I've heard Northwestern is very into interdisciplinary studies. What is this like?</em></p>

<p>It's true that NU encourages interdisciplinary work. I can only speak to this from my own perspective, but I think this is an area where NU's resources really shine.  We have a thriving cognitive science program which brings in a number of speakers and offers alternative avenues for travel/research funding. The philosophy department has close working relationships with the faculty in linguistics and psychology. Grads from philosophy regularly take courses outside the department in allied departments. Faculty from those departments participate in our reading groups, attend talks, and participate in the Philosophy and Linguistics Workgroup.</p>

<p><em>What do you think of the Graduate Interdisciplinary Cluster program?  </em></p>

<p>I think the long term goal of the cluster programs is to have people apply directly to the clusters through The Grad School and do away with departmental applications. I think that's a particularly bad idea and I don't think it will happen. That said the cluster programs currently provide an alternative route into the department. In fact, one could apply both to the cluster program and to the department. Unfortunately you'll have to have particular interests for such an option to be feasible. </p>

<p><em>What are my chances of admittance given GRE XXX and GPA X.X?</em></p>

<p>I have no idea. Northwestern is very competitive so you want good scores, and great writing sample, and nice letters of recommendation, just like anywhere else. I don't know anyone's actual scores (mine would be irrelevant since I never applied) however, my impression is that past applicants have had quite good scores. <br />
</p>]]>
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Disagreement&apos;s Theme Song</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/2008/10/disagreements-theme-song.html" />
    <id>tag:matthew.ektopos.com,2008:/philosophy//15.5334</id>

    <published>2008-10-24T20:23:32Z</published>
    <updated>2008-10-24T20:34:55Z</updated>

    <summary>Lately I&apos;ve been thinking a lot about peer disagreement. Basically the question to be answered is; what does rationality require when we come to find out that we disagree with someone who we take to be our epistemic peer? There are two prevailing ways in which philosophers have responded to this question. There are the conformist who recommend that we adjust our beliefs in the direction of our peers, and the non-conformist who insist that no adjustment is required. It will come as no surprise to those that know me, but I&apos;m a non-conformist. Of course, all of this is simply a setup for me to point out that Dave Mason has been a non-conformist for years! In fact, he may have written non-conformism&apos;s theme song &quot;We Just Disagree&quot;. So let&apos;s leave it alone, &apos;cause we can&apos;t see eye to eye. There ain&apos;t no good guys, there ain&apos;t no bad guys. There&apos;s only you and me and we just disagree. Ooo - ooo - ooohoo oh - oh - o-whoa...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Mullins</name>
        <uri>http://matthew.ektopos.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Lately I've been thinking a lot about peer disagreement. Basically the question to be answered is; what does rationality require when we come to find out that we disagree with someone who we take to be our epistemic peer? There are two prevailing ways in which philosophers have responded to this question. There are the conformist who recommend that we adjust our beliefs in the direction of our peers, and the non-conformist who insist that no adjustment is required. It will come as no surprise to those that know me, but I'm a non-conformist. Of course, all of this is simply a setup for me to point out that Dave Mason has been a non-conformist for years! In fact, he may have written non-conformism's theme song "We Just Disagree".</p>

<p><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p8_FOQ7-P30&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p8_FOQ7-P30&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object></p>

<p><br />
So let's leave it alone, 'cause we can't see eye to eye.<br />
There ain't no good guys, there ain't no bad guys.<br />
There's only you and me and we just disagree.<br />
Ooo - ooo - ooohoo oh - oh - o-whoa</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Northwestern Looking for LEMMings</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/2008/09/northwestern-is-looking-for-tw.html" />
    <id>tag:matthew.ektopos.com,2008:/philosophy//15.5234</id>

    <published>2008-09-10T18:13:20Z</published>
    <updated>2008-09-10T18:19:28Z</updated>

    <summary>Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. Rank open, tenured or tenure-track, beginning fall quarter, 2009. Multiple positions possible. 4 courses/year spread over 3 quarters, undergraduate and graduate Thesis supervision. Usual non-teaching duties. AOS: Metaphysics or Epistemology or Philosophy of Language or Philosophy of Mind (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science). AOC: Open.Salary Competitive. AA/EOE. Women and members of minority groups are encouraged to apply. Junior candidates should submit complete CV, three letters of recommendation, and writing sample; senior candidates should submit complete CV along with list of references. Send application materials to Search Committee 1, Department of Philosophy, Northwestern University, Kresge 2-335, 1880 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208. Candidates whose materials are received by November 15, 2008 will get primary consideration. http://www.wcas.northwestern.edu/epistemology/employment.html...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Mullins</name>
        <uri>http://matthew.ektopos.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois. Rank open, tenured or tenure-track, beginning fall quarter, 2009. Multiple positions possible. 4 courses/year spread over 3 quarters, undergraduate and graduate Thesis supervision.  Usual non-teaching duties. AOS: Metaphysics or Epistemology or Philosophy of Language or Philosophy of Mind (including Philosophy of Cognitive Science). AOC: Open.Salary Competitive. AA/EOE. Women and members of minority groups are encouraged to apply.  Junior candidates should submit complete CV, three letters of recommendation, and writing sample; senior candidates should submit complete CV along with list of references. Send application materials to Search Committee 1, Department of Philosophy, Northwestern University, Kresge 2-335, 1880 Campus Drive, Evanston, IL 60208.  Candidates whose materials are received by November 15, 2008 will get primary consideration. </p>

<p><a href="http://www.wcas.northwestern.edu/epistemology/employment.html">http://www.wcas.northwestern.edu/epistemology/employment.html</a></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Converstations with Izzy</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/2008/07/converstations-with-izzy.html" />
    <id>tag:matthew.ektopos.com,2008:/philosophy//15.5120</id>

    <published>2008-07-19T03:45:48Z</published>
    <updated>2008-07-19T05:19:35Z</updated>

    <summary>Getting through graduate school with a child presents some unique challenges, but it also has a few great upsides. One of those upsides is the amount of time you get to spend with your child in comparison to your friends doing the daily grind of a 9-5. The area where we live has a walk score of 85, which my daughter Izzy and I take advantage of most days. I&apos;ve learned this year that, apparently, one of the favorite occupations of four-year-olds is near constant conversation. Sometimes these conversations are a bit one sided, stream of consciousness, affairs. However, she can also be very introspective and earnest. Almost always, though, she talks with the gesturing habits of an Italian butcher. One of the things that&apos;s interesting about talking to a four-year-old is that they can hit on some philosophically interesting topics. For example, there was the discussion that come out of Izzy&apos;s proclaiming that God couldn&apos;t exist because he doesn&apos;t have a body. I&apos;m constantly amazed at how much of a materialist she can be. This afternoon, as we walked a couple of blocks to meet my wife, Izzy began talking to me about her brain. Specifically about how her...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Mullins</name>
        <uri>http://matthew.ektopos.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/">
        <![CDATA[<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/assets_c/2008/07/100_0811.html" onclick="window.open('http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/assets_c/2008/07/100_0811.html','popup','width=3296,height=2472,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/assets_c/2008/07/100_0811-thumb-320x240.jpg" width="320" height="240" alt="Riding the El" class="mt-image-center" style="text-align: center; display: block; margin: 0 auto 20px;" /></a></span>Getting through graduate school with a child presents some unique challenges, but it also has a few great upsides. One of those upsides is the amount of time you get to spend with your child in comparison to your friends doing the daily grind of a 9-5. The area where we live has a <a href="http://www.walkscore.com">walk score</a> of 85, which my daughter Izzy and I take advantage of most days. I've learned this year that, apparently, one of the favorite occupations of four-year-olds is near constant conversation. Sometimes these conversations are a bit one sided, stream of consciousness, affairs. However, she can also be very introspective and earnest. Almost always, though, she talks with the gesturing habits of an Italian butcher.</p>

<p>One of the things that's interesting about talking to a four-year-old is that they can hit on some philosophically interesting topics. For example, there was the discussion that come out of Izzy's proclaiming that God couldn't exist because he doesn't have a body. I'm constantly amazed at how much of a materialist she can be. This afternoon, as we walked a couple of blocks to meet my wife, Izzy began talking to me about her brain. Specifically about how her memories are in her brain. I don't know why, but I was a bit surprised that she said 'brain' and not 'mind'. So, I began asking her questions like "Are all your thoughts in your brain?" Her response was a seemingly certain yes. She said some part were for memories, but other parts did other work. I tried to ask her about qualia. She thought it was just to have your brain be a certain way, though she confessed to not really understanding how.</p>

<p>I was having a good deal of fun with the philosophy of mind discussion, so I thought I'd push on the personal identity. I asked her, "What would happen if we switched our brains? That is, what would happen if we put your brain in my body and my brain in your body?" Her response... "That's absurd!" (I'm always surprised by some of the words she uses.) I told her that probably more than a few philosophers agreed with her, but to try and imagine it in any case. We had to set a side the fact that her brain is smaller than mine, and that mine wouldn't fit in her body. In the end she concluded that she'd see out of my body and I'd see out of hers. I wanted to press her on fission cases, but sadly we'd arrived at her mother's hair salon. Apparently hair products and chocolates are serious distractions to doing philosophy.<br />
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Putnam Desktop Wallpaper</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/2008/06/putnam-desktop-wallpaper.html" />
    <id>tag:matthew.ektopos.com,2008:/philosophy//15.5062</id>

    <published>2008-06-23T05:23:52Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-23T05:36:13Z</updated>

    <summary>Andrew delivers a new desktop wallpaper with a Lewisian theme, which got me thinking modally. Here is a send up to Hilary Putnam and his Twin Earth argument. Of course philosophers will know that this wallpaper will need to be run on anything but ubuntu. So, if you&apos;re running Windows, get yourself a nice ubuntu theme to go with this wallpaper....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Mullins</name>
        <uri>http://matthew.ektopos.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Andrew delivers a new desktop wallpaper with a <a href="http://www.andrewcullison.com/2008/06/david-lewis-wallpaper/">Lewisian theme</a>, which got me thinking modally. Here is a send up to Hilary Putnam and his Twin Earth argument. Of course philosophers will know that this wallpaper will need to be run on anything but ubuntu. So, if you're running Windows, get yourself a nice <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=Windows+%22ubuntu+theme%22">ubuntu theme</a> to go with this wallpaper.<br />
 <br />
<span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><a href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/images/putnam-ubuntu-color-wallpaper.html" onclick="window.open('http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/images/putnam-ubuntu-color-wallpaper.html','popup','width=1997,height=1251,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"><img src="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/images/putnam-ubuntu-color-wallpaper-thumb-320x200.jpg" width="320" height="200" alt="putnam-ubuntu-color-wallpaper.jpg" class="mt-image-none" style="" /></a></span></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Goldman Desktop Wallpaper</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/2008/06/goldman-desktop-wallpaper.html" />
    <id>tag:matthew.ektopos.com,2008:/philosophy//15.5058</id>

    <published>2008-06-21T18:37:52Z</published>
    <updated>2008-06-22T03:19:16Z</updated>

    <summary>Andrew Cullison thinks that philosophers should have desktop wallpapers that represent their philosophical heroes. (In his case that would be Roderick Chisholm.) I take my philosophical responsibilities seriously and easily picked up on the normative aspect of Andrew&apos;s post. I think he&apos;s got a good stab at a principle, but it&apos;s just a little strong in the &apos;hero&apos; aspect. Wouldn&apos;t something closer to &apos;star&apos; or &apos;worthy of fandom&apos; get more people under the bar? In any case, here is my first stab at fulfilling my responsibilities and displaying my full geek pride. I made an Ubuntu desktop wallpaper that represents someone who has deeply influenced my philosophical thinking, Alvin Goldman. I thought Goldman was appropriate since I switched to ubuntu for its process reliability. Grab your own copy of the Goldman Reliability Wallpaper....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Mullins</name>
        <uri>http://matthew.ektopos.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/">
        <![CDATA[<p>Andrew Cullison thinks that philosophers should have <a href="http://www.andrewcullison.com/2008/06/chisholm-desktop-wallpaper/">desktop wallpapers that represent their philosophical heroes</a>. (In his case that would be Roderick Chisholm.) I take my philosophical responsibilities seriously and easily picked up on the normative aspect of Andrew's post. I think he's got a good stab at a principle, but it's just a little strong in the 'hero' aspect. Wouldn't something closer to 'star' or 'worthy of fandom' get more people under the bar?</p>

<p>In any case, here is my first stab at fulfilling my responsibilities and displaying my full geek pride. I made an Ubuntu desktop wallpaper that represents someone who has deeply influenced my philosophical thinking, Alvin Goldman. I thought Goldman was appropriate since I switched to ubuntu for its process reliability. </p>

<p><span class="mt-enclosure mt-enclosure-image" style="display: inline;"><img alt="Screenshot.png" src="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/images/Screenshot.png" width="320" height="240" class="mt-image-none" style="" /></span></p>

<p>Grab your own copy of the <a href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/images/goldman-ubuntu-color-wallpaper.jpg">Goldman Reliability Wallpaper</a>.</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Thinking Meat</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/2008/05/thinking-meat.html" />
    <id>tag:matthew.ektopos.com,2008:/philosophy//15.5008</id>

    <published>2008-05-28T07:25:16Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-28T07:36:32Z</updated>

    <summary>This term I&apos;ve been TAing for a modern philosophy course and its had me thinking a fair bit about the mind/body problem. This has been floating around the Internet for years, but one of my colleagues pointed me to Terry Bisson&apos;s Nebula nominated short story &quot;They&apos;re Made Out Of Meat&quot; which is a stitch to read. If you don&apos;t want to read the story you can watch the well produced short film based on the script....</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Mullins</name>
        <uri>http://matthew.ektopos.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/">
        <![CDATA[<p>This term I've been TAing for a modern philosophy course and its had me thinking a fair bit about the mind/body problem. This has been floating around the Internet for years, but one of my colleagues pointed me to Terry Bisson's Nebula nominated short story "<a href="http://www.terrybisson.com/meat.html">They're Made Out Of Meat</a>" which is a stitch to read. If you don't want to read the story you can watch the well produced short film based on the script.</p>

<p><object width="425" height="355"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/gaFZTAOb7IE&hl=en"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/gaFZTAOb7IE&hl=en" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="355"></embed></object></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Second Annual Midwest Epistemology Workshop</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/2008/05/second-annual-midwest-epistemo.html" />
    <id>tag:matthew.ektopos.com,2008:/philosophy//15.4978</id>

    <published>2008-05-12T17:01:51Z</published>
    <updated>2008-05-14T03:06:39Z</updated>

    <summary>The University of Nebraska-Lincoln will be hosting the second annual Midwest Epistemology Workshop. The workshop is an annual event where epistemologists present and discuss recently completed work or work in progress that is close to completion. All epistemologists (regardless of geographical location) are welcome to attend. It will take place October 17-18, 2008, on the campus of UNL. Tyler Burge (UCLA) will be giving the keynote address. The second workshop consists of eight nonconcurrent sessions, each involving a presentation of approximately 40 minutes followed by 40 minutes of discussion. Workshop papers will be made available to participants in advance of the workshop. Other than Burge, this year&apos;s presenters included Mike Bergmann (Purdue), Andy Egan (Michigan), Adam Leite (Indiana), Peter Markie (Missouri), Brit Brogaard (Missouri-St. Louis), Jonathan Weinberg (Indiana), Juan Comesaña (Wisconsin). MEW2 is supported by the Chambers Research Fund, the UNL College of Arts and Sciences, the UNL Philosophy Department, and the Cedric Evans Memorial Lecture Fund. The conference website for the second annual Midwest Epistemology Workshop. Information from the first MEW (which took place November 2007 at Northwestern University) can be found here. (A forthcoming edition of Philosophical Studies is being devoted to the talks given there.)...</summary>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Mullins</name>
        <uri>http://matthew.ektopos.com</uri>
    </author>
    
        <category term="Conferences" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#category" />
    
    <category term="epistemology" label="Epistemology" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    <category term="midwestepistemologyworkshop" label="Midwest Epistemology Workshop" scheme="http://www.sixapart.com/ns/types#tag" />
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/">
        <![CDATA[<p>The University of Nebraska-Lincoln will be hosting the second annual
Midwest Epistemology Workshop. The workshop is an annual event where
epistemologists present and discuss recently completed work or work in
progress that is close to completion. All epistemologists (regardless
of geographical location) are welcome to attend. </p>
	<p>It will take place October 17-18, 2008, on the campus of UNL.  Tyler Burge (UCLA) will be giving the keynote address.  </p>
	<p>The
second workshop consists of eight nonconcurrent sessions, each
involving a presentation of approximately 40 minutes followed by 40
minutes of discussion. Workshop papers will be made available to
participants in advance of the workshop. Other than Burge, this year's
presenters included Mike Bergmann (Purdue), Andy Egan (Michigan), Adam
Leite (Indiana), Peter Markie (Missouri), Brit Brogaard (Missouri-St.
Louis), Jonathan Weinberg (Indiana), Juan Comesaña (Wisconsin).</p>
	<p>MEW2
is supported by the Chambers Research Fund, the UNL College of Arts and
Sciences, the UNL Philosophy Department, and the Cedric Evans Memorial
Lecture Fund.</p>
	<p>The conference website for the second annual <a href="http://www.wcas.northwestern.edu/epistemology/mew/mew2/index.html">Midwest Epistemology Workshop</a>.</p>
	<p>Information from the first MEW (which took place November 2007 at Northwestern University) can be found <a href="http://www.wcas.northwestern.edu/epistemology/mew/mew1/index.html">here</a>.  (A forthcoming edition of <em>Philosophical Studies</em> is being devoted to the talks given there.)
</p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Build your own Impossible Triangle</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/2007/12/build-your-own-impossible-tria.html" />
    <id>tag:matthew.ektopos.com,2007:/philosophy//15.4607</id>

    <published>2007-12-11T05:21:42Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-11T05:38:43Z</updated>

    <summary><![CDATA[For the last couple of years I&#39;ve had something of a fascination with impossible objects and the representation of impossible objects. One of my favorites is the Penrose &quot;impossible&quot; triangle. The Penrose triangle was used by MC Escher in his famous &quot;Waterfall&quot; lithograph, and it appears in plenty of other &quot;impossible&quot; works.The other day I discovered a web site that has a printable pdf that you can print out and use to build your own impossible triangle. The design works best when used with heavier paper....]]></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Mullins</name>
        <uri>http://matthew.ektopos.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/">
        <![CDATA[<p>For the last couple of years I&#39;ve had something of a fascination with impossible objects and the representation of impossible objects. One of my favorites is the Penrose &quot;impossible&quot; triangle. The Penrose triangle was used by MC Escher in his famous &quot;Waterfall&quot; lithograph, and it appears in plenty of other &quot;impossible&quot; works.</p><p>The other day I discovered a <a href="http://www.coolopticalillusions.com/build-an-impossible-triangle.htm">web site</a> that has a <a href="http://www.coolopticalillusions.com/illusions/coolprinttriangle.pdf">printable pdf</a> that you can print out and use to build your own impossible triangle. The design works best when used with heavier paper.<br /> </p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

<entry>
    <title>Kit Fine: Doin&apos; It Well</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/2007/09/kit-fine-doin-it-well.html" />
    <id>tag:matthew.ektopos.com,2007:/philosophy//15.4393</id>

    <published>2007-09-15T21:38:06Z</published>
    <updated>2007-12-06T05:43:07Z</updated>

    <summary></summary>
    <author>
        <name>Matthew Mullins</name>
        <uri>http://matthew.ektopos.com</uri>
    </author>
    
    
    <content type="html" xml:lang="en" xml:base="http://matthew.ektopos.com/philosophy/">
        <![CDATA[<p><object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/clWI6PdZFv8"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/clWI6PdZFv8" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object></p>]]>
        
    </content>
</entry>

</feed>
